Updated (2017): See .NET Core Releases to learn about newer releases. This release is not supported.
Today, we are announcing the release of .NET Core RC2. You can use it to build ASP.NET Core, console apps and class libraries for Windows, OS X and Linux. RC2 is a major update from the November RC1 release, including new APIs, performance and reliability improvements and a new set of tools.
You can install .NET Core SDK 1.0 Preview 1 now (including .NET Core RC2), on Windows, OS X and Linux. You can also use it with Docker.
You can use .NET Core RC2 with a variety of editors and IDEs:
- In Visual Studio 2015 Update 2
- In Visual Studio Code with the C# extension, now with debugging!
- Eventually, in your favorite Omnisharp-enabled editor
Coming soon:
- Deploy .NET Core RC2 apps to Azure Websites
- Acquire .NET Core RC2 with RedHat Enterprise Linux yum installer
We’ve been working directly with a number of customers who are hosting RC1 in production today, on Windows and Linux. Thanks for using RC1! Some of those customers have already moved to RC2, also in production. We appreciate all the feedback we’ve received since we released RC1. Please continue that feedback with the RC2 release.
Releases
Today, we are releasing three components (release notes below).
We made major changes to the .NET Core SDK, formerly called DNX, since RC1. These changes were fairly significant, and we plan to make additional changes before the final release of the SDK. As a result, we opted to call the SDK a preview release. While that may sound like a concern, the SDK is typically only used and development time, not in production, and so changes to the SDK should not affect running applications.
.NET Core and ASP.NET Core have improved significantly since RC1. We’ve added features and improved performance and reliability. RC1 was “Go Live” and so is RC2. “Go Live” means you can call Microsoft Support for help with issues.
Note that the .NET Core SDK includes a new telemetry feature. See the end of the post for more information on .NET Core Tools data collection.
Platform Support
We’ve been adding support for a growing number of operating systems. We started out the project with a plan to support .NET Core on Windows, OS X and Linux. Close watchers of the coreclr and corefx projects will have noticed that the platform support has been growing steadily. .NET Core RC2 is supported on the following platforms.
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.2
- Centos 7.1
- Debian 8.2+
- Ubuntu 14.04 (16.04 support is coming at RTM)
- Linux Mint 17+
- OS X 10.11
- Windows 7+ / Windows Server 2012 R2+
- Windows Nano Server TP5
.NET Core RC2 will soon be showing up in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux software collection. You will be able to install it with yum, following instructions which will soon be posted to the redhatloves.net site.
Ubuntu was the first distro that we supported. We heard feedback that it made more sense to start with Debian, given that it is the parent of Ubuntu and many more distros. More recently, we added support for Debian, enabling .NET Core to be used in a larger set of Debian-based distros.
We intend .NET Core to be an open and flexible development platform. We’ll publish instructions in the next couple weeks on how to test .NET Core on arbitrary distros. You can see how Linux Mint is supported in runtimes.json, for example.
.NET Core Tools
You typically start .NET Core development by installing the .NET Core SDK. The SDK includes enough software to build an app. The SDK gives you both the .NET Core Tools and a copy of .NET Core. As new versions of .NET Core are made available, you can download and install them without needing to get a new version of the tools.
Apps specify their dependence on a particular .NET Core version via the project.json project file. The tools help you acquire and use that .NET Core version. You can switch between multiple apps on your machine in Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code or at a command prompt and the .NET Core tools will always pick the right version of .NET Core to use within the context of each app.
You can also have multiple versions of the .NET Core tools on your machine, too, which can be important for continuous integration and other scenarios. Most of the time, you will just have one copy of the tools, since doing so provides a simpler experience.
The dotnet Tool
Your .NET Core experience will start with the dotnet tool. It exposes a set of commands for common operations, including restoring packages, building your project and unit testing. It also includes a command to create an empty new project to make it easy to get started.
There are many tools that come with the .NET Core Tools. You won’t see most of them since they all expose themselves through the dotnet tool. dotnet has a very simple extensibility model, so it’s also easy to add more commands as needed.
The following list provides a partial list of the commands.
dotnet new– Initializes a sample console C# project.dotnet restore– Restores the dependencies for a given application.dotnet build– Builds a .NET Core application.dotnet publish– Publishes a .NET portable or self-contained application.dotnet run– Runs the application from source.dotnet test– Runs tests using a test runner specified in the project.json.dotnet pack– Creates a NuGet package of your code.
dotnet new also supports F#. You can type dotnet new --lang F# to create a new F# app. The .NET Core Tools will download F# tools as part of dotnet restore. VB is not yet supported.
Development Workflow
The .NET Core tools enable multiple workflows.
The simplest one is the following, which uses the tools to create a new project, restore its package dependencies, and then build and run the app.
dotnet new
dotnet restore
dotnet run
You can separate the run command into two steps. In the example below, the app is called “test-app”, hence the dll name.
dotnet build
dotnet bin/Debug/netcoreapp1.0/test-app.dll
The tools also enable producing NuGet packages, Unit testing and other scenarios. You can learn more in the .NET Core docs.
For Unit testing with xUnit, see the Getting started with xUnit (.NET Core / ASP.NET Core) page.
Comparison to DNX
We learned a lot from our experience building DNX, with RC1 and prior .NET Core releases. DNX was actually three things at once:
- a set of tools
- a set of framework libraries
- a set of services available to apps
The tools part of DNX lines up best with the .NET Core Tools that are part of today’s release.
DNX was great if you wanted all three of those things, but could be a problem if you only wanted one or two of them. This problem became obvious to us as we experimented with the corert native compilation project, which required a different set of tools than DNX provided. DNX also relied on environment variables to set an “in use” version. That made it hard to use multiple .NET Core apps from the same command prompt.
Those challenges provided us with a set of issues to resolve as we started our .NET Core RC2 project. They were the impetus to building the .NET Core RC2 tools.
The dotnet tool replaces the dnx and dnu tools that came with RC1. The dnvm tool doesn’t have a replacement yet. That’s something that might come in a later release.
.NET Core App Types
We’ve talked to many customers about how they want to deploy apps. We heard two main models:
- Deploy smaller apps that have a dependency on a centrally installed .NET Core version, perhaps used by multiple apps. We call this model “portable”.
- Deploy larger self-contained apps that have no .NET Core dependencies. We call this model “self-contained”.
Both of these app deployment models are supported and are a good choice, depending on the scenario. As of RC2, we have focussed most on the first scenario. We will continue to improve both scenarios.
Portable Apps
Portable applications are the default application type in .NET Core. They require .NET Core to be installed on the targeted machine in order for them to run. This means that your application is portable between installations of .NET Core, including on multiple OSes.
This type of application will only carry its own code and dependencies that are outside of .NET Core libraries. As long as .NET Core is installed on a given machine, the app will typically work. You do not need to decide upfront which OSes your app will run on.
Self-contained Apps
Self-contained applications contain all of their app dependencies, including the .NET Core runtime, as part of the application. This makes the app larger, but also makes it capable of running on any .NET Core supported platforms with the correct native dependencies, whether it has .NET Core installed or not. This makes it that much easier to deploy to the target machine, since you only deploy your application.
Since the application carries the runtime, you need to make an explicit choice which platforms your application needs to run on. For instance, if you publish a self-contained application for Windows 10, that same application will not work on OS X or Linux and vice versa. Of course, you can add or remove platforms during development at any given time.
Framework APIs
We added over a 1000 new APIs in .NET Core RC2. You can see the release notes and the complete API diff for .NET Core RC2 relative to RC1.
We added APIs to the following existing namespaces and classes:
New .NET Core APIs
- System.Drawing
- System.IO.BufferedStream
- System.IO.Packaging
APIs added in RC2 to existing classes and namespaces
- System.Console
- System.Data
- System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo
- System.Environment
- System.Linq
- System.Reflection
- System.Runtime.InteropServices
- System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation
- System.Security.Cryptography
- System.Security.Principal
- System.Security.WindowsPrincipal
- System.ServiceModel
More detailed description of System.Data additions:
- SqlBulkCopy was added to System.Data.SqlClient for bulk operations.
- System.Data interfaces were re-introduced.
- DbDataReader API added to retrieve the Schema information for the tables being queried.
- MARS support.
We are committed to adding many more APIs in future releases.
Runtime Improvements
There were many performance and reliability improvements since RC1. There were also some larger improvements, described below.
JIT Compiler
There were three major improvements to the RyuJIT JIT compiler.
- RyuJIT has been updated to include all the RyuJIT improvements that were included in the .NET Framework 4.6.1.
- RyuJIT-provided SIMD code generation for System.Numerics on all platforms.
- Code-quality improvements (more optimized code) in some cases.
Garbage Collection
The garbage collector now supports background server garbage collection (GC) on Unix operating systems. Server GC was available in RC1, but was not optimized on Unix. In RC2, the server GC has been optimized for Unix and we have also enabled background garbage collection. This should result in lower pause times.
You can read the original introduction of background server GC in .NET Framework 4.5 blog post to learn more about it.
Runtime Configuration
.NET Core supports a new way of specifying runtime configuration. This is conceptually similar to the app.config files that are used with .NET Framework apps.
The runtime configuration files store the dependencies of an application (formerly stored in the .deps file). They also include runtime configuration options, such as the Garbage Collector mode. Optionally they can also include data for runtime compilation (compilation settings used to compile the original application, and reference assemblies used by the application).
NuGet Package References
.NET Core is a platform of packages. You can see how these packages are referenced in a set of simple .NET Core samples that we have published. There are two metapackages that you will typically reference in your project file, one or the other. One is for apps and libraries that will only run on .NET Core and the other for libraries that you intend to run on all .NET platforms.
Microsoft .NET Core
Most of the time, you will reference the Microsoft.NETCore.App package. This package represents the same set of libraries that are shipped with the various .NET Core installers. The .NET Core tools understand this reference and can use the locally installed copy of .NET Core instead of relying on the versions from NuGet. The NuGet packages are used for compilation, however.
You will also add references to other NuGet packages, for example to ASP.NET Core packages.
.NET Standard Library
The .NET Standard Library is a new concept that represents the APIs available in all .NET implementations, at least those that support it. The .NET Framework, .NET Core and Mono/Xamarin will or already do support the .NET Standard Library. The .NET Standard Library can be thought of as the next version of Portable Class Libraries, but the set of APIs available and the way you create the libraries are much different.
The set of APIs exposed by the .NET Standard Library is currently smaller than we intend. In the next few releases, we intend to expand this set of libraries considerably to provide much more compatibility with the .NET Framework. We’ll publish more on this plan soon.
The .NET Standard versions. Each new .NET Standard version includes more APIs and provides support for later .NET platform versions, such as .NET Framework 4.6. Earlier .NET Standard versions include fewer APIs and support more .NET platform versions. As a library implementer, you target a particular .NET Standard version, to get the right combination of APIs and platform support.
You can create .NET Standard libraries of your own by referencing the NETStandard.Library package. It references all of the packages that are part of the .NET Standard Library. You also specify a .NET Standard target framework version so that you compile your library against the right .NET Standard version. You can package up your library with dotnet pack and deploy the NuGet package to NuGet.org or another NuGet server.
.NET Core Tools Telemetry
The .NET Core tools include a new telemetry feature so that we can collect usage information about the .NET Core Tools. It’s important that we understand how the tools are being used so that we can improve them. Part of the reason the tools are in Preview is that we don’t have enough information on the way that they will be used. The telemetry is only in the tools and does not affect your app.
Behavior
The telemetry feature is on by default. The data collected will be anonymous in nature and published in an aggregated form for use by both Microsoft and community engineers under a Creative Commons license.
You can opt-out of the telemetry feature by setting an environment variable DOTNET_CLI_TELEMETRY_OPTOUT (e.g. export on OS X/Linux, set on Windows) to true (e.g. “true”, 1). Doing this will stop the collection process from running.
Data Points
The feature collects the following pieces of data:
- The command being used (e.g. “build”, “restore”)
- The ExitCode of the command
- For test projects, the test runner being used
- The timestamp of invocation
- The framework used
- Whether runtime IDs are present in the “runtimes” node
- The CLI version being used
The feature will not collect any personal data, such as usernames or emails. It will not scan your code and not extract any project-level data that can be considered sensitive, such as name, repo or author (if you set those in your project.json). We want to know how the tools are used, not what you are using the tools to build. If you find sensitive data being collected, that’s a bug. Please file an issue and it will be fixed.
EULA
We use the MICROSOFT .NET LIBRARY EULA for the .NET Core Tools, which we also use for all .NET NuGet packages. We recently added a “DATA” section re-printed below, to enable telemetry from the tools. We want to stay with one EULA for .NET Core and only intend to collect data from the tools, not the runtime or libraries.
DATA. The software may collect information about you and your use of the software, and send that to Microsoft. Microsoft may use this information to improve our products and services. You can learn more about data collection and use in the help documentation and the privacy statement at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=528096. Your use of the software operates as your consent to these practices.
Closing
We’re excited to be releasing .NET Core 1.0 RC2, .NET Core SDK 1.0 Preview 1 and ASP.NET Core 1.0 RC2. We hope that you enjoy using these releases.
Please give us feedback on the releases. We’ll be watching for feedback through GitHub issues and other feedback forums. The best place to start is the Core repo. You can file an issue there. Do file an issue on one of the more specific .NET Core repos if you are familiar with them: coreclr, corefx and cli.
Thanks for your trying out .NET Core RC2!

“There were many performance and reliability improvements since RC2. ”
Should this be “since RC1”?
Oops. You are correct. Thanks!
Congratulations! The wait is finally over!
Aww System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe didn’t make RC2? :/ will it be in rtm?
@aL yes, everything in master at this point will make RTM
Awsome! Thank you for all your great work!
I thought I had read project.json would be dropped. I understood wrong? No Web.config back?
You understood well, but not in RC2. It will happen in later releases of the SDK. For web.config in ASP.NET Core, see https://docs.asp.net/en/latest/fundamentals/configuration.html
What I meant with “Web.config” was the xml file itself. Your link did mention it but after that only the json file. Don’t get me wrong I didn’t start with ASP.NET Core already, still linking the dots.
The article shows configuration builders. It’s possible to build one’s own, but the wisest path is probably to move away from web.config if you’re going to use ASP.NET Core.
I’m still not able to debug. No *.exe generated and after running with F5 (dubugging) on the generated *.dll just get the ‘Hello World!’ output.
The tools don’t generate a .exe, but a dll that is hosted by the ‘dotnet’ tool.
Can you describe your configuration more? You certainly should have debugging.
It says Windows 7+ / Server 2012 R2+
Does it work with Windows Server 2012?
I updated the text to make it more clear.
I’m not seeing the updated text, could you clarify what the server support is? One would presume it would be Server 2008 R2, as that’s the server equivelant of Windows 7?
It’s not clear. Does it work with 2012 or only 2012 R2+.
That needs some explanation if it’s true :-/
“Yes, your server is supported.”
– GuardRex https://github.com/aspnet/IISIntegration/issues/179
“Windows Server 2008 R2 and newer”
– ASP.NET Core IIS Publishing Docs https://docs.asp.net/en/latest/publishing/iis.html
“Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 – 2016”
– .NET Core Roadmap https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/roadmap.md
Windows Server 2008R2 seems to be supported, so I would assume 2012 is too.
what about openSUSE/SUSE support? Is that planned at any point?
It’s something we’re tracking. You can see we have enough support for testing, here: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx#build–test-status.
“additional Crypto details in the next section”.. what section?
That content got moved to the release notes: https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/release-notes/1.0/Release-Notes-RC2.md
Wait, System.Drawing is back? Can you please elaborate a little bit or point us to a link?
Thanks, and congrats!
Just a couple of primitives, not much of actual ‘drawing’. See https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/release-notes/1.0/RC1-RC2_API_diff.md#systemdrawing and https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/pull/5223 for the actual PR.
Really? Weren’t there any better APIs to choose from? Win2D?
Well actually if you look at the diff at https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/release-notes/1.0/RC1-RC2_API_diff.md there are only primitives present (like point, rectangle and size).
Correct.
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
“complete API diff” links to 404. Should be https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/release-notes/1.0/RC1-RC2_API_diff.md
Will there also an version for `Visual Studio “15” Preview 2`?
+1 I agree! Why would anyone use 2015? 🙂
Are there a timeline for a release to vs15 preview2?
Good q. I don’t have any dates on that. Watch the VS Blog: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/visualstudio/
I have been trying to uninstall RC1, but it is prompting for the installer and I can’t find any links to it. Anyone able to provide a link so I can try to get this off of my machine first?
Hate to do it, but same here. Trying to uninstall RC1 (“Microsoft ASP.NET 5 RC1 Update 1”), of which there are TWO in the Apps & features list, and it’s asking for the file “AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1.exe”.
So..
1. do we NEED to uninstall ASP.NET 5?
2. HOW do we uninstall ASP.NET 5?
3. WHY are there TWO entries? (“uninstalling” one gives a “uninstall complete”, but yet it remains in the Apps & features list)
…..why are MS updates so hard
You can download RC1 (not update 1!) from this link https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=49959
Except… the uninstaller is looking specifically for: AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1.exe
On that page, there’s only a link to download AspNet5.ENU.RC1.exe
Therefore, the uninstall fails.
https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=627627
The download worked for me! Thanks!
Hi Tom
You can find the original RC1U1 installer here: http://download.microsoft.com/download/B/0/A/B0AEBD7D-6979-4265-B1AC-A0B73618FB22/AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1.exe
Do check the version in ARP. The link I posted is for 1.0.11123
We did ship two other variations as part of the Azure SDK release and as an update for VS 2015
You can find those here:
(1.0.11125): http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/E/B/DEB395C9-C875-47F3-96F7-55C9A8FCD869/AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1.exe
(1.0.20204): http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/8/0/18048EDD-9F45-479A-B208-6F7C91CF2ECC/AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1_KB3137909.exe
@Jacques Eloff
Thanks a lot! These links saved me few hours.
How about asp.net native compilation?
The “.NET Standard Library” explanation is very unclear. Do you mean that a .NET Standard Library cannot access the full .NET Core API?
That’s right. .NET Standard is smaller than the .NET Core API. There are libraries outside of it. If you look at the dependencies of Microsoft.NETCore.App, you’ll see: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.NETCore.App.
We are going to significantly expand .NET Standard Library, so some of these libraries will likely come in, but not all of them. For example, we’re not likely to pull in the language specific libraries or a particular assembly loader.
Following instructions at https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#windows:
What app exactly needs to be uninstalled? Is it “Microsoft ASP.NET 5 RC1”? What about “Microsoft Dotnet CLI for Windows (1.0.0.001598)”? I assume “Microsoft HTTP Platform Handler 1.2” will remain? More detailed instructions would be helpful for those upgrading from RC1.
Also, if there are multiple projects I assume that they cannot be run side by side, i.e. RC1 and RC2? That is unfortunate if the case.
Uninstall the 1598 version of the Dotnet CLI. The RC1 of ASP.NET should be fine to keep. I haven’t tried the RC1 + RC2 in the same solution option.
As posted above… HOW do we uninstall RC1?
You can uninstall RC1 from Add/Remove software in Windows. You will need the installer for RC1 tho, download it here (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=49959) if you don’t have it on your computer anymore.
Nope.
The uninstaller is looking specifically for: AspNet5.ENU.RC1_Update1.exe
On that page, there’s only a link to download AspNet5.ENU.RC1.exe
Therefore, the uninstall fails.
You shouldn’t have to uninstall RC1 to use RC2. That said, if you’re goal is to uninstall RC2, I have heard of this problem happening. I’ll try to get someone the knows how to fix it to respond here.
Thanks Peter, this worked. Just to clarify, I think the .NET Core installation text should be changed from:
“Remove all previous versions of .NET Core from your system by using Add/Remove programs”
to
“Remove all previous versions of .NET Core RC2 from your system by using Add/Remove programs”
There is no need to uninstall RC1, at least not for my installation.
In addition, if you see the “error: The supplied user buffer is not valid for the requested operation”, it means that you haven’t installed NuGet Manager extension for Visual Studio.
Great to hear Mark G! We’ll try to get the text updated shortly.
Thanks for good news! Can we use same method to publish like I saw in this post http://bit.ly/1Vhz9O4 ?
Re: “Coming soon: Deploy .NET Core RC2 apps to Azure Websites”
Pretty much all our projects target Azure Web Apps, as they’re now called, and I need to know if there is a documented semi-manual procedure for deploying to Azure Web Apps, or whether this release is not going to work out for me and others targeting your cloud platform.
What’s the expected timeline of being able to run RC2 on Azure? Is it days? Weeks? Months?
It’s interesting defining the “release” a new version of ASP.NET Core but not being able to actually run the software we write. Really you guys should not have announced ASP.NET Core RC2 as released if we can’t use it in our servers. Web dev cycles push up on a daily basis, so it’s not like it’s feasible to upgrade the codebase without actually being able to push to staging/production.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/webdev/2016/05/16/announcing-asp-net-core-rc2/ says later this week
Oh big thanks. Missed that!
The week’s passed away… I really need to deploy. 🙁
Unfortunately the URL “MICROSOFT .NET LIBRARY EULA” (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=329770) doesn’t work.
Could you provide with the correct link?
Thank you!
Really sorry. We moved our website at the same time as launch and the license got deleted. We’re getting it re-published.
installation directions for OSX are horrible. Come on run through it one time as if you didn’t know…
https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#macosx
Worked fine for me. Didn’t put the binaries (like `dotnet`) in the PATH though.
Are you still having trouble? Certainly, many of us tested those. Can you share your error?
Please, for the love of money, get the tools to work behind a corporate proxy!!! I cannot for the life of me understand how in this day and age we are still having issues with proxies. Trying to build apps using the new toolset fails fetching anything related to nuget because of proxy errors. Github has several issues reported on this already so why isn’t this a priority?
As Nuget integration in .NET and VS has increased the quality of Nuget and the tooling has decreased. This isn’t really acceptable in this day and age. You’re building the toolset on a package manager that seems to break every time it is released. OSS is great but every since the community has been working on things the quality has been going down. Maybe it is time to put some quality constraints back in. I’m really starting to believe .NET Standard is going to drive people away, not bring them together.
I will pass on this feedback. Thanks!
I’m the PM on the NuGet team and we would love to understand what issue you are running into in this specific case. While there are a number of issues we are targeting to fix in this area https://github.com/NuGet/Home/search?q=proxy&type=Issues&utf8=%E2%9C%93, if you can file an issue on GitHub (http://gitbhub.com/nuget/home) with a repro, we can work with you to fix this. You can also reach out to us directly at support@nuget.org as well.
Same problem here.
“dotnet restore” won’t work behind proxy. Assume this is nuget working in the background although there is no reference to nuget in the output (sorry, am new to this toolset)? Should this be logged as an issue with nuget?
Yes, please file an issue at http://github.com/nuget/home.
Problem still persists. since upgrading to Core Rc2, seems like the restore behind corporate proxy wont work.
there is an ugly workaround that you can do with Fiddler (automatically authenticate rule 127.0.0.1:8888),
but this has to be solved, seems like dotnet command ignores the proxy configuration of the machine.
my developers cant restore packages which is pretty annoying. the process ends up with http 407 (proxy authentication required).
I had SqLite working in RC1 and having trouble finding the database in RC2. I could use the checklist for SqLite in RC2.
Are you asking for a sample / instructions on using SqlLite with RC2?
There is an example from the OSCON talks here: https://github.com/davidfowl/Oscon2016/tree/master/AttendeeList . I haven’t seen a checklist for SQLite.
Will you support Roslyn Analyzer for .NET Core, especially out of Visual Studio? I think Codefix Provider depends on VS SDK so it’s difficult to support, but how about Analyzer?
Sorry, Analyzer is not accurate, I mean Analyzer as “Diagnostic with Code Fix (Nuget)” and CodeFix Provider as “Code Refactoring (VSIX)”
Hi,
I partially migrated my RC1 app to RC2.
EntityFramework seems to have an issue which was on my side but might have a performance issue, not a big deal actually.
The biggest problem I encounter is with Localization, I can’t find a way to make it work again, I tried severals approach but querystrings, cookies or headers doesn’t change the lang in my app, that is frustrating because I’m so confused right now. Any help would be awesome.
I finally made it without the localization middleware which seems to be broken by implementing my own solution, just need azure to get rc2 works out of the box now
you could use dnx/dnu with mono on 32-bit linux. but this is no longer possible with ‘dotnet’. what’t the story here?
How i can reference .Net framework library project in core RC2. I’m getting error “The following projects are not supported as reference:
.NetCoreAPP, version=v1.0 -> .NetFramework, Version=v4.6.1”
to use the full .net framwork in your project.json
“frameworks”: {
“net452”: { }
}
Will F# IDE experience be supported in Preview 2?
I’m a bit lost on what to install actually. Should I go and download from: https://www.microsoft.com/net/download#core. But then, what is the difference between .NET Core Installer (runtime?) and .NET Core SDK Installer (dev tools?)? And when exactly should I pick the Windows (Server Hosting) installer? But then again, what is the difference between these installers and the Visual Studio official MSI Installer that is offered here: https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#windows?
Where is System.Drawing? and how can we reference it ? i want to just reference to .netcore and not the full framework, can we do this ?
** Releases**
.NET Core RC2 & .NET Core RC2 SDK Preview 1 , both links are pointed to same reference page /site. Are these release are same? Else what is/ are difference(s) in RC2 vs RC2 SDK Preview 1.
As I found out (see my previous question) the .NET Core RC2 = runtime, what you need when you want to deploy an application, whereas the .NET Core RC2 SDK Preview 1 contains the developer tools required to create apps.
HI, I want to know whether it is possible to reference a .NET Core project from a Classic Windows App/Library in the same solution, or vice versa? Thank you!
works well on Linux Mint 17.3
I am using RC1 with the full framework — net46. I have found instructions to remove RC1. What about the Microsoft HTTP Platform Handler 1.2? How do I remove it? Or is it still being used?
It is confusing that the download site for NET has NET461 as a separate download without instructions to install RC2. Yet what I am reading online suggests that I need to install CLI: https://ievangelist.github.io/blog/migrating-to-rc2/ Is this because it is MVC6 and not a web application?
I like what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and reporting!
Keep up the wonderful works guys I’ve incorporated you guys
to our blogroll.
Over a 1000 new APIs in .NET Core RC2! really cool the Self-contained applications with all depenencies and difficult to belive see multiple platform support for many Linux distributions
Regards from @Jecaestevez
You’re scared for yourself, and your family, and your friends.
But he seldom stood up to her on any issues, even small ones, or ever communicated
at all until he would finally blow up. Said to Ron Weasley, Voldemort’s Horcrux torments him in an attempt to protect itself before Ron stabs it.
Just make sure they are the mommy ones with lots of cushions
and an ottoman to put your feet up and you will be all
set. There are also two achievements earned by completing the various race challenges you’ll find
scattered around the island.
As of 6/5/2016, no xunit version including pre-releases exists that works with the latest .Net core version of 1.5.0-rc2-24027. I cannot test unit test any .net core project at this time. Anyone facing the same issue?
I’ve been surfing online more than 2 hours today, yet I never
found any interesting article like yours. It’s
pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made good
content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.
com, in HD to see how well the frame handled one in the easiest to obtain videos and did need to
run it from the Div – X converter. Check your features with the top five and decide on a single for yourself.
Cordless tool battery comparison The motor is in the main area right above the dust
collection tank as well as the hose enters the tank with plenty of room for hair along with other stuff to penetrate without clogging.
Ni-Cad (Nickel Cadmium) rechargeables are generally
somewhat cheaper to change than Ni – Mh (Nickel Metal Hydride), but are available
in fewer stores. After all, they can go anywhere in their
kitchen without needing to drag a cord around, it doesn’t matter how big the kitchen is.
Any word on when RC2 will be available in Azure? I migrated my app over to RC2 from RC1 and was sad to realize that it isn’t supported…
It turns out that, if you are part of a Windows Insider program and you’re testing Microsoft .NET Core, every time that a new build is installed on your machine, aspnetcore.dll gets corrupt or the system is unable to load it. Any ETA for the fix to this issue?
toe nail designs easy cool toenail designs
However, it really is also a really inexpensive
one, costing below $20 dollars. Helens version is really a solar paneled roof top tent using a photovoltaic cell on the
surface of it’s hard shell for raising and reducing the tent, not for solar power through the tent.
In a normal situation, should you enable WPA and enter a passphrase in conjunction with MAC Address Filtering, your laptop is safe to work with wireless.
are great placesfor they as in these places, data is presented from manycomputers.
Netgear wireless range extenders This also, obviously, depends about how
determined your assailant is.
These are being used in a number of ways like security systems
cameras watching the cars parked in no parking zone or people breaking traffic rules regarding traffic controlling of city.
Home automation may be the wave in the future, and it truly is already here.
Home security simon xt A lot of burglar alarm system
dealerships will take care of the cost from the
hardware after you sign up for the monitoring program making the expense to begin surprisingly low.
If you employ a tight budget to deal with, you could look for the basic alarm system.
The main panel in the home burglar security alarm
informs i – Alert services or central monitoring services
to inform the property owner of some intruder’s presence within their house-hold.
Besides, their significant role naturally and economy, they beautify the environment to make life more colorful and meaningful.
Custom Boutonniere by Beautiful Blooms This white rose and Peacock feather
can be a perfect complement towards the stunning cascade of white roses inside White Pageant Style Bouquet.
You now have a lovely centerpiece that you can place all along down the middle from
the tables.
With just a little attention and care you’ll be able to enjoy them for the long
time. If he does, you will need to either block rid of it or remove the flower.
System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement is no longer supported since RC1, can you advise if it’s still coming and what is the short term solution for on premises AD login without ADFS
Has some one using .net core rc 2 to build blockchain trading? Can share?