Microspeak: Reporting through


I'll start with the citation from a hypothetical conversation:

"This is being handled by Jonathan Swift."

Who does he report through?

"He reports up through Jane Austen's org."

The Microspeak term report through (or report up through) comes up often in situations where people from different groups are working together. In its most literal meaning, to report through someone is to have that person as your manager, or your manager's manager, or your manager's manager's manager, etc. (Not that any of those people beyond two levels actually reads any of the reports you've written!)

Usually, when someone asks who a person reports through, they are looking for the manager who reports to an implied reference point. The location of this reference point varies depending context.

For example, if the discussion is in the context of coordinating efforts across all of Microsoft, then the implied reference point is Steve Ballmer. Somebody who works on Windows reports through Steve Sinofsky, whereas someone who works on Office reports through Kurt DelBene.

On the other hand, if the discussion is in the context of coordinating efforts within Windows, then the implied reference point is Steve Sinofsky. The answer to "Who does he report through" would be the manager who directly reports to Steve Sinofsky.

Bonus Microspeak: Org is a common short form of the word organization, meaning "group of people who all report (directly or indirectly) to the same person."

Comments (5)
  1. I sure hope Jane keeps a tight leash on that Swift wacko.

  2. caf says:

    The "reports through" terminology pretty common elsewhere in the corporate world too.

  3. NT says:

    I always thought there should be an outlook/headtrax feature that, given a person, tells you the lowest person you "report through" that they also "report through." I'd call it, "How High Do I Need To Go In My Own Org To Find Someone To Yell At This Guy?" or "Lowest Common Grandmanager"

    [Polyarchy in 2D mode will tell you this. -Raymond]
  4. James Schend says:

    Re: Polyarchy

    Raymond, can you provide more information? A search for "polyarchy" didn't bring up anything relevant, nor did "polyarchy outlook"… is that a built-in feature, or an add-on?

    [I was talking to NT, who was already using internal Microsoft tools like headtrax. I responded with the name of another internal Microsoft tool. -Raymond]
  5. James Schend says:

    Ah, sorry. For the record, I didn't know headtrax was an internal tool, either.

Comments are closed.

Skip to main content