Help! Tests that used to pass in HCK QFE 006 now fail in QFE 007 and QFE 008


We have discovered that HCK 2.1 QFE 007 introduced some regressions to tests that used to work in previous versions of the kit.

These are the affected tests:

  • BitLocker Tpm And Recovery Password tests for AOAC devices with Legacy PCRs
  • BitLocker Tpm And Recovery Password tests for AOAC devices with PCR 7
  • BitLocker Tpm+PIN+ USB and Recovery Password tests for NON ARM devices
  • BitLocker Tpm and Recovery Password tests for non-AOAC devices for Legacy PCRs
  • BitLocker Tpm and Recovery password tests for non-AOAC devices with PCR 7
  • Storage Performance CS
  • BDE WLK Test
  • BDE WLK Test – OS Volume Only

We’ve created a set of errata to address these issues while a fix to the kit is being developed and tested. If you’re trying to submit with HCK 2.1 with QFE 007 or QFE 008 and are getting failures in some of these tests, please use this table to identify the corresponding errata to mention in the readme.doc file of your submission:

  4849

  HCK Errata: System – Partition Validation in QFE007

  4855

  HCK Errata – BitLocker Tpm and Recovery Password tests for non-AOAC devices for Legacy PCRs test fails in QFE007 and QFE008

  4856

  HCK Errata: BitLocker Tpm+PIN+ USB and Recovery Password tests for NON ARM devices failing in QFE007 and QFE008

  4857

  HCK Errata: Test BitLocker Tpm And Recovery Password tests for AOAC devices with Legacy PCRs failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

  4858

  HCK Errata: Test BitLocker Tpm And Recovery Password tests for AOAC devices with PCR[7] failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

  4859

  HCK Errata: Test BitLocker Tpm and Recovery password tests for non-AOAC devices with PCR[7] failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

  4860

  HCK Errata: Test Storage Performance CS failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

  4861

 HCK Errata: Test BDE WLK Test failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

  4862

  HCK Errata: Test BDE WLK Test – OS Volume Only failing in HCK 2.1 with QFE007 and QFE008

Comments (8)

  1. Hristo says:

    Nyamam opit v taya oblast,nachinaesht sum,no shte razgledam podrobno statiyata!

    Shte naucha neshto novo i polezno,blagodarya Vi!

  2. Yoshiharu_Tamaoki says:

    The expiration of these errata will be on 5/31/2014, so are you planing to fix these failures by 5/31/2014?  

  3. Atul Marathe says:

    I'm trying to get my volume lower filter driver certified, but I don't see any way to specify the INF as it used to be for earlier DTM studio. Do I still need to get it certified, and if so, how can I proceed?

    Thanks,

    Atul.

  4. Oswaldo A. Aquique says:

    The plan is to have this issues resolved before the expiration of the errata mentioned above. If there is any change in that regards, we'll extent the expiration dates accordingly.

  5. Oswaldo A. Aquique says:

    @Atul

    We have some information on how to test filter drivers here in MSDN at msdn.microsoft.com/…/jj124779.aspx.

    Some information about how to install filter drivers is available at the following links:

    msdn.microsoft.com/…/ff547595(v=vs.85).aspx

    msdn.microsoft.com/…/ff554866(v=vs.85).aspx

    msdn.microsoft.com/…/ff545162(v=vs.85).aspx

  6. Hristo, we are not able to translate your post. If you are able to post in English, we can respond as needed. Thanks!

  7. Atul Marathe says:

    Thanks Oswaldo!

    I'll go thru the list and see if I can make any progress.

  8. Paulo Giuliani says:

    Does anyone have problem with Trim Performance tests? On winfows 8.1 x86, trim performance test fails all the time. I have no ideia how to send the "Erratum" mentioned by 3419 filter observation.

    Thanks

Skip to main content