Workaround: Arrays with non-zero lower bounds
Posted by: Phil Weber, VB MVP
This post applies to Visual Basic .NET 2002/2003/2005
OK, now that Paul Vick has explained why VB.NET doesn't support arrays with non-zero lower bounds, let's see how we can do them anyway. ;-)
Say you want to store a collection of annual values in an array of integers. It's reasonable that the array index would correspond to the year in question; that is, TotalSales(1981) would contain the sales total for the year 1981.
In pre-.NET versions of VB, we could simply do this:
Dim TotalSales(1981 To 2000) As Integer
Problem solved. But as Paul has explained, VB.NET no longer lets us do that. We can, however, do this:
Dim TotalSales As New VBArray(1981, 2000)
TotalSales(1981) = 345
TotalSales(2000) = 995
Console.WriteLine(TotalSales(1981))
Console.WriteLine(TotalSales(2000))
I can live with that, how about you?
This class (based on this post by Eric Gunnerson) is what makes it all possible:
Public Class VBArray
Private _lbound As Integer
Private _int() As Integer
Public Sub New(ByVal LBound As Integer, ByVal UBound As Integer)
Me.ReDim(LBound, UBound)
End Sub
Public Sub [ReDim](ByVal LBound As Integer, ByVal UBound As Integer)
_lbound = LBound
ReDim _int(UBound - LBound + 1)
End Sub
Default Public Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As Integer
Get
Return _int(Index - _lbound)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As Integer)
_int(Index - _lbound) = Value
End Set
End Property
Public Function ToArray() As Integer()
Return _int
End Function
End Class
I've included a ToArray method which returns the underlying array, in case you need to pass it to another method, or manipulate it in other array-type ways.
Note that this class is hard-coded to handle Integers; in VB.NET 2002/2003, you must create a separate class for each array type you wish to simulate. Generics in Visual Basic .NET 2005 will make this sort of thing much cleaner.