Active Directory Lookup? Or, User Name Mapping? Or Both?
User Name Mapping in Windows Server 2003 R2 and Services for UNIX allows you map UNIX user and group accounts to their Windows counterparts (both local and domain accounts). This service is used by Server for NFS and Client for NFS (also by Windows Remote Shell Service in SFU 3.5).
UNIX uses UIDs and GIDs to identify user and group account while Windows uses SIDs. User Name Mapping provides a mechanism for Windows to correctly authenticate users and groups who access Windows NFS shares from UNIX clients or UNIX NFS shares from Windows clients.
User Name Mapping is the only way Services for UNIX components can map UNIX UIDs/GIDs to Windows SIDs (and vice versa) but starting with Windows Server 2003 R2 and Windows Vista, Server for NFS and Client for NFS can also use Active Directory Lookup feature to query this information directly from AD. It adds another level of integration with Active Directory and Server for NIS for these components and can help you do away with User Name Mapping and therefore, reducing administrative overhead.
Note: User Name Mapping in R2 is the final release of this component. It’ll not be supported in future releases of Services for NFS.
If you have tried configuring Server or Client for NFS in R2, you might have noticed that you can use Active Directory Lookup and User Name Mapping at the same time.
Why? Don't they do the same thing? Why would I use them both at the same time?
Active Directory Lookup and User Name Mapping - both allow you to map Windows SIDs to UIDs and GIDs (and vice versa). However, there's big difference - User Name Mapping allows you to do advanced mappings where you can map users who have different login names on Windows and UNIX systems. It also allows you to map multiple Windows accounts to a single UNIX account to simplify NFS access.
If you have populated UNIX attributes for all of your user and group accounts in Active Directory, you should use Active Directory Lookup. But, if you still depend on the passwd and group files or UNIX-based NIS servers to determine UIDs and GIDs for user and group accounts, you are good to go with User Name Mapping.
Using both of them makes sense in a situation where you have a mix of Windows accounts with their UNIX attributes saved in AD and still have a need to map with UNIX sources for some of the accounts.
Using them both can also help you slowly move over to Active Directory for storing UNIX attributes.
Word of caution - if you think using both of them is necessary for your setup, take care that you don’t have accounts in AD with one set of UNIX attributes and then also map those same accounts to another set of UNIX attributes using User Name Mapping. That can lead to confusion while you determine effective permissions.
Important: A memory leak in the Lsass.exe process forces Lsass.exe process to use more memory than expected. This can result in domain controllers becoming unresponsive over time and may need a reboot. This problem can be fixed by installing hot fix 931307. Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 includes this fix so if you are already on Service Pack 2, you are safe.