Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Let’s have two examples to illustrate the difference between two discount concurrency models: pricing zone and compete within priority and compound across.
| Offer | Details | Priority |
| A | 10% off compounded | 99 |
| B | 20% off compounded | 99 |
| C | 15% off compounded | 0 |
Pricing zone
Two offers A and B from higher priority 99 would be compounded together, so A and B are compounded together. C is not applied.
Compete within priority and compound across.
Two offers A and B from higher priority 99 compete and offer B wins. Offer C of priority 0 would then be compounded on top of offer B. In the end, B and C are compounded together.
| Offer | Details | Priority |
| A | 10% off compounded | 99 |
| B | 20% off compounded | 99 |
| C | 15% off compounded | 0 |
| D | 35% off best price | 99 |
Pricing zone
Two offers A and B from higher priority 99 would be compounded together, competing with best price D. D wins and C is not applied.
Compete within priority and compound across.
Three offers A, B and D from higher priority 99 compete and offer D wins. Offer C of priority 0 would then be compounded on top of offer B. In the end, D and C are compounded together.
Please note that there is no difference between compounded and best price here.
Related: Retail Discount Concurrency Control – Pricing Zone
Related: Retail Discount Concurrency Control – Compete Within Priority and Compound Across