Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Retailers love compounding discounts. Just the other day, I saw 50% off on top of another 50% off. By the face value, it feels like free, while in reality, it’s 75% off total because the second 50% off is on the discounted price.
Let’s get into more details.
Order of compounding: which discount to apply first?
Discounts are sponsored by various agents. Often retailers want to apply vendor-sponsored discounts first, and retailer-sponsored ones last.
Sometimes they don’t care. Even in that case, technically, we still need to set some order. We have 3 basic discount methods: unit price, amount off and percentage off. To get a consistent result, we need to set some order.
Compounding is not always straightforward.
It’s trivial with compounded simple discounts.
It’s also manageable with 1 compounded mix and match (multi-item) discount and multiple compounded simple discounts. In fact, if you walk into any of major grocery stores in the United States, you would see a discount of buying 6+ wines to get additional 10% off on top of individual discounts.
For compounded mix and match (multi-item) discounts, it gets messy because each of the 2 mix and match discounts may operate on different sets of items, and the end results will likely confuse customers, and retailers as well.
Not sure if I made myself clear in the last sentence, but you can take it yourself: say you need to buy 2 keyboards ($20 each) and 2 mice ($10), what deal would you get with the following compounded mix and match discounts?
- Buy one get least expensive one for 1 cent, for any of the two.
- Buy one get least expensive one 50% off. It has to be one keyboard and one mouse.
What happens when we have another non-compounding discount covering the same product(s)?
The key question is whether you want to have compounded discounts to compete with non-compounded discounts. In general, retailers do.
And take into account multiple compounded multi-item discounts and order of compounding.
In fact, the more and deeper I think of it, the crazier it drives me.
In reality, luckily, retailers often prefer to offering easily-understandable discounts.
As a matter of fact, I haven’t seen a single case of 2 compounded mix and match (or multi-item) discounts in any retail stores.
We need one single rule to make it (a lot) easier: do not compound 2 multi-item discounts together. In other words, when it happens - it's not always easy to prevent it from happening - they compete.
Related: Retail Discount Concurrency – Best Deal Knapsack Problem