We've heard a few comments/complaints about how the gradient selection has been removed in Beta 2, both as an option and as the default selection color. Since it's come up so many times, I figured you could all use an explanation as to why we did it (effectively, scrolling performance and UX).
First off, for the people who do miss gradient selection, I wrote an extension that adds it back (when you have the rich-client experience enabled). You can find it here, on vsgallery. Also, the source is available on github.
One of the common complaints from Beta 1 and, to a much more significant degree, from the CTP, was that scrolling speed was a big problem, especially under remote desktop and if you were running a VM; essentially, any combination of software rendering and/or the limited bandwidth of a remote session was making scrolling painful.
Part of the reason why we had this issue was because of the way the gradient selection works - whenever you increase the height of the selection with a vertical gradient (as was the default), the editor needed to repaint the entire selection. Similarly, whenever you increase the width of a selection with a horizontal gradient, the selection would need repainted. In the worst case, then, where you have an arbitrarily complex brush, any change in selection size requires redrawing the entire selection. If you include the border (as a pen), then you have other interesting issues when the shape of the selection changes.
If you changed the VS settings to not automatically detect rich-client experience, so that the gradient was enabled over remote desktop or in software rendering mode, you'd get an idea for how painful this was. As the selection got larger, the editor would redraw more and more on each change. This was especially bad if the selection was partially off the screen, as drawing the gradient properly requires that the lines off the screen also went through the layout pass, so that we could know their height (usually, lines that aren't visible don't participate in layout).
In Beta 1, the gradient was off by default when not in rich-client mode, so you wouldn't see it by default over remote desktop. It was still painful if you turned it on by default or weren't automatically in simple graphics mode.
With a solid color selection, on the other hand, you can make certain assumptions about the selection. The most important of these is that if you add or remove areas to the selection, you only need to redraw those portions. As you increase the size of the selection, you only need to redraw the new areas that are being selected. Effectively, the cost of drawing the selection in this case is relative to the change in selection size, instead of relative to the absolute selection size.
And if part of the selection is off the screen, you can just ignore that completely — no need to even think about those lines until they are scrolled back into view.
So, if your selection brush (generally, a solid color brush) doesn't care about the size of the whole selection, and you don't have a border that also cares about the selection as a whole, then you can be much smarter about redraw.
You can still actually have a non-solid color brush when you make these assumptions, as long as the brush is drawn per line. If you have a vertical gradient in this case, the gradient will appear to start/stop on each line. So, for almost all purposes, this really only looks good with a solid color brush with no border.
The other reason, which I know much less about, was UX. The basic explanation, as it filtered down to me, was the push to make things appear visibly simpler in the UI. Most people saw the gradient selection as pretty but without utility, which isn't a redeeming enough quality to warrant keeping it around.
Of course, the people who miss it have given good reasons for wanting it around. The best reason I've heard so far is that the gradient gives you visual clues about where you in a file. I can certainly see that, though the value of that seems to degrade when the selection is small (1-3 lines) and very large (larger than the screen). Then again, I could see an argument for while it would still be useful for a giant selection (you can tell if you are underneath, above, or right at the midline of the selection).
The real answer here is the answer I tend to give to everyone — extensibility. For many cases, the answer to "why doesn't the editor do foo" is isn't that such a thing is impossible, just that it isn't built-in.
So, while we did remove the gradient selection as an option in the product, we didn't remove the code that knows how to draw a selection with an arbitrary brush and pen (for the border). As such, getting the gradient selection back requires just a little bit of code.
Here's the pertinent part:
There's a bit more to the extension than that; notably, if you supply a gradient and the editor is not in rich-client mode, it'll draw the gradient per-line instead of over the entire selection, so there's logic in there to clear out the gradient brush when rich-client mode is disabled.
The other thing that may not be immediately apparent from the code is that you could change this per language (per content type), or even (if you wanted) based upon some text in the file (like vim or emacs mode lines). I'm not sure how desirable that is, but it may be interesting for your python files to use a different selection color than the rest of your files. Who knows?