Are you using ConcRT, PPL, or the Agents Library? We’d love to know.

Are you using ConcRT, the Parallel Patterns Library (PPL), or the Asynchronous Agents Library?  Are you planning to use or are you already using any of those technologies in a production application or library?

We'd love to hear about it, and if you have time, what your experiences have been (good or bad).  Please email me at aymans at microsoft dot com... we're looking forward to hearing from you.  Thanks!

Ayman Shoukry
Parallel Computing Platform Team

Comments (3)

  1. Piotr says:

    It’s nice piece of design, I would love to use it if it was a portable solution (Unix, BSD, Cray) & Open Source (so I can modify it as I wish).

  2. jps says:

    Same goes for me — would love to use it but it's not portable. At this point it's an academic exercise.

  3. Rahul Patil [MSFT] says:

    Thanks for the replies. Some number of our customers have reported that portability is very important. For now, we are working closely with Intel to align our efforts with Intel TBB, which runs on many other OS. A good portion of our PPL libraries map 1:1 with TBB.

    I would love to hear what you use today to achieve portability.



Skip to main content