Add-on Guidelines in Action – Crawler Toolbar


A new version of the Crawler Toolbar has recently been released and comes with many improvements to the user experience similar to the changes we described in a previous post about the AVG Security Toolbar. It’s another great example of the Guidelines for add-on developers in action. Here are some high-level examples of the changes they’ve made:

  • The close button is visible so that users can manage it like other toolbars. Additionally, the toolbar is positioned in a supported location which improves stability and performance.
  • It no longer modifies the new tab page to maintain a predictable new tab experience for users.

Many thanks to the Crawler Toolbar team for the work they’ve done to provide a more predictable and reliable experience, keeping users in control of the browser.

-Paul Cutsinger and Herman Ng

Before: Previous version of Crawler Toolbar

new tab page with the old Crawler toolbar which modifies the new tab page.

After: Newest version (5.1.0.177) of the Crawler Toolbar provides a more predictable experience and lets users stay in control of their browser

new tab page with the new Crawler toolbar which does not modify the new tab page.

Comments (30)

  1. Anonymous says:

    another useless toolbar. i have toolbars. i don’t nned them and i don’t use them.

  2. Anonymous says:

    damn, a typo :) so once again and correctly:

    another useless toolbar. i hate toolbars. i don’t need them and i don’t use them.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Toolbar fancy. Waiting for new kind of toolbar with more function

  4. Anonymous says:

    hey, where is my previous comment about i have toolbars like this one? censorship ? this topic about this toolbar is absolutely useless as the toolbar itself. i suggest to put here some detail info about next version of IE or about the latests security problem found in IE.

  5. Anonymous says:

    correction:

    … i hate toolbars like this one?…

  6. Jim says:

    Why can’t I disable the Google toolbar with the x? Try it – it is impossible disable the Google add-ons in IE8 with the x next to the toolbar; to stop it from spying on your web browsing you have to uninstall it from add/remove programs.

  7. Mitch 74 says:

    Cool, nice, thanks.

    About the Chinese cyber attack against Google etc. that’s creating a roar, it is said McAfee notified Microsoft that it’s using (among other vectors) a yet not public IE flaw. Could we get specifics?

    I don’t want to nag, but had it been a Firefox flaw, there’d already be an announcement on the Mozilla blog, a proposed workaround, and a tentative release date for a fixed version. The same with Opera and Chrome.

    Safari would keep mum about it and release a fix in April, so don’t feel bad yet. I’ll just remind you that it’s already been publicized, and although details are unknown and should remain so until a fix is ready, a time table, affected products, workarounds etc. would be helpful.

  8. Illogical Cynic says:

    If the guidelines are so important, why does the browser allow a toolbar to be created which doesn’t have a functional close button and is in a silly place?

    It’s quite unfortunate also that the example toolbar here is still incredibly ugly and… offers a search box. When the browser already has one built in. Good move, that.

  9. frank says:

    I find it quite funny that we are still talking about toolbars.

    Outside of the Web Developer Toolbar for Firefox I don’t use any toolbar addons – yet I have dozens and dozens of addons installed in Firefox.

    Then again in IE I don’t have any installed because there are no good, free addons for IE.

  10. Matthew says:

    <<there are no good, free addons for IE>>

    Most things phrased as absolutes, including that remark, are plainly incorrect.

    Had you said "there are lots and lots of bad free and pay add-ons for IE" then I’d have to agree with you.

  11. Revlon says:

    Interesting post. By the way, could you post something regarding future plans of IE, i.e. SVG support, HTML5 elements implementation, etc?

    Thank you

  12. Rob Parsons says:

    AOL toolbar next please.

    Oh the Google Toolbar about:tabs hijack also.

    Is the Crawler Toolbar from conduit? Are they adhering to ‘standards’ for their custom builds?

    I see Conduit is a sponsor of the Addons Developer site. Except for some of their ‘custom’ builds I have found that their products generally have a good user experience.

  13. Jason says:

    @Matthew – Name 10 good free addons for IE.  It isn’t easy is it?

    Yet if you reverse that and name 10 good free addons for Firefox – its a piece of cake.

  14. all2010videos says:

    A new add-on for IE, this is amazing. But as time goes on and many add-ons created, is it not affected the bulky think that affects the computer someday?

  15. Mitch 74 says:

    @EricLaw: thanks for the link!

  16. Zane M says:

    All part of Microsoft’s plan to get rid of the Google toolbar!

    Step 1: Create a set of "guidelines" in 2009, after toolbars have been used by millions of users.

    Step 2: Make it very easy to accidentally close the toolbars, and claim that it is about "user choice"!  Of course, no Microsoft product is designed with close buttons on the left hand side, but somehow it is the *right* location in a IE toolbar!

    Step 3: Pay vendors to utilize the new "guidelines" and show them around as pretty ponies

    Step 4: Sue Google, telling the judge how great the guidelines are and how everyone else is doing it!

    Good Job, Microsoft!

  17. Phil says:

    Microsoft *sue* Google? You clearly don’t know much about the law.

    If Google gets sued, it will be by end-users; Google *pays* other companies to install their toolbar, and they make it hard for the user to get rid of it. Pretty sad.

  18. Tihiy says:

    Toolbars aren’t worth their space.

  19. Nick says:

    I’m not a fan of toolbars, I like when it there is space :) But Firefox plugin SeoQuake is worth that space :)

  20. gawicks says:

    I got a call from my neighbor one day .He was complaining that his browser (IE8) was not  working apparently due to no reason.

    When I got there ,TOO late he had already switched to Firefox.

    The sad part is that it wasn’t totally IE’s fault.A bad browser toolbar was crashing and ie was continuously recovering the page.

    It was partly IE’s fault because it wasn’t smart enough to disable the offending add-on.

    Not everyone knows or wants to mess with iexplore-extoff you know.

  21. nav01 says:

    Three countries have now warned their citizens about using IE and you guys are posting about toolbars?

  22. Anti-Alarmist says:

    @nav01: If you’re still using IE6, you SHOULD be worried, and should upgrade to something more secure today. ie8 has dep and aslr and runs in protect mode.

    … and if you think that just using a non-IE browser will help you, keep in mind that FF had more vulnerabilities last year than IE did.  And for the chrome fans in the house, keep in mind that Acrobat Reader was one of the other vectors the china hackers were using, and that chrome runs its extensions in a full-trust process not in protect mode.

  23. Greg says:

    If you do view source for a plain simple html page with 4000 rows in a table with 6 columns per row, IT 8 stalls out and takes hundreds of megabytes of memory.  Can we get a view source that doesn’t try to parse the source such as a ‘View Source as Text’

  24. chrome frame will make IE AWESOME says:

    Bundle Chrome Frame with IE = instant win

  25. Lenen says:

    @Greg

    You’re right, but IE isn’t the only browser having problems with large tables.

  26. buat duit says:

    Toolbar fancy. Waiting for new kind of toolbar with more function

  27. Question for the IE team, what exactly do I have to do to force IE7 and lower to render pages served as application/xml in standards mode?

    Due to the W3C bot issue I’ve been forced to use the not-a-doctype HTML5 "doctype" and I’ve been able to get the page styling to apply however not matter what I do in IE7 and below IE always forces the page to be rendered in quirks mode. I’m well aware of IE6 and below’s inability to render XHTML documents in standards mode with the XML declaration which is not part of the dilema.