There’s a lot of great discussion from the window arranging post. This really shows how important these details are to people. Being able to arrange how apps are shown on screen is key for productivity because it impacts almost every task. It’s also very personal – people want to be in control of their work environment and have it set up the way that feels right.
One thing that should be clear is that it would not be possible for us to provide solutions to all the different ways people would like to work and all of the different tools and affordances people have suggested--I think everyone can see how overloaded we would be with options and UI absorbing all the suggestions! At first this might seem to be a bit of a bummer, but one thing we loved was hearing about all the tools and utilities you use (and you write!) to make a Windows PC your PC. Our goal is not to provide the solution to every conceivable way of potentially managing your desktop, but rather to provide an amazing way to manage your desktop along with customizations and personalizations plus a platform where people can develop tools that further enhance the desktop in unique and innovative ways. And as we have talked about, even that is a huge challenge as we cannot provide infinite customization and hooks—that really isn’t technically possible. But with this approach Windows provides a high degree (but not infinite) flexibility, developers provide additional tools, computer makers can differentiate their PCs, and you can tune the UI to be highly personalized and productive for the way you want to work using a combination of thos elements and your own preferences.
One other thing worth noting is that a lot of the comments referred to oft discussed elements in Windows, such as stealing the focus of windows, the registry, or managing the z-order of windows—a great source of history and witticisms about Windows APIs is from Raymond Chen’s blog. Raymond is a long-time developer on the Windows team and author of Old New Thing, The: Practical Development Throughout the Evolution of Windows. This is also a good source to read where the boundaries are between what Windows does and what developers of applications can choose to be responsible for doing (and what they are capable of customizing).
With that intro, Dave wanted to follow up with some additional insights the team has taken away from the discussion. --Steven
We saw several pieces of feedback popping up consistently throughout the comments. Paraphrasing the feedback (more details below), it sounds like there’s strong sentiment on these points:
- The size of windows matters, but wasting time resizing windows is annoying.
- Just let me decide where the windows go – I know best where my windows belong.
- Dragging files around is cumbersome because the target window (or desktop) is often buried.
- Desire for better ways to peek at the running windows in order to find what we’re trying to switch to.
- Want a predictable way to make the window fit the content (not necessarily maximized).
- Want to keep my personalized glass color, even when a window is maximized.
For each of these needs, there’s a lot of great discussion around possible solutions – both features from other products, and totally novel approaches. It’s clear from these comments that there’s a desire for improvement, and that you’ve been thinking about this area long enough to have come up with some fairly detailed recommendations! Below are a excerpts from some of the conversations ongoing in the comments.
Put the windows where I want them
It’s super interesting to see people discussing the existing features, and where they work or don’t work.
For example, @d_e is a fan of the existing tiling options in the taskbar:
Arranging windows in a split-window fashion is actually quite easy: While pressing CTRL select multiple windows in the taskbar. Then right-click them and select one of the tiling options...
But that approach doesn’t quite meet the goal for @Xepol:
As for the window reorder buttons on the taskbar -> I've known they were there since Win95, but I never use them. They never do what I want. If they even get close to the right layout, its the wrong window order. Since I have to drag stuff around anyways, its just easier to get exactly what I want the first time.
@Aengeln suggests taking the basic idea of tiled windows to the next level in order to make them really useful:
A very useful feature would be the ability to split the deskotop into separate portions, especially on larger screens. For example, I might want to maximize my Messenger window to a small part on the right hand side of the desktop and still have the ability to maximize other windows into the remaing space. Non-maximized windows would be able to float across both (all) parts of the desktop.
It sounds like there’s agreement that optimizing the screen space for more than one window would be super useful, if it would only let you stay in control of where windows ended up, and was easy and quick to use every day. The current tiling features in the taskbar give hints at how this could be valuable, but aren’t quite fast and easy enough to be habit forming.
Open at the right size
We saw a lot of comments on the “default size” of windows, and questions about how that’s decided. Applications get to choose what size they open at, and generally use whichever size they were at the last time they were closed (or they can choose not to honor those settings). One of the cases that can trip people up is when IE opens a small window (websites will do this sometimes), because once you close it that will be the new “last size”.
@magicalclick suggested a solution:
I wish I have one more caption button, FIXED SIZE. Actually it is a checkbox. When I check the box, it will save the window state for this application. After that, I can resize/move around. When I close window, it will not save the later changes.
@steven_sinofsky offered this advanced user tip that you can use to start being more click-efficient right away:
@magicalclick I dislike when that one happens! Rather than add another button or space to click, I do the same thing in one click with a "power user" trick which is when you see the small window open don't close it until you first open up another copy of the application with the "normal" window size. Then close the small one and then the normal one.
Of course this is a pain and close to impossible for anyone to find, but likely a better solution than adding a fourth UI affordance on the title bar.
Finding the right window
The word being used is “Expose”:
@Joey_j: Windows needs an Exposé-like feature. I want to see all of my windows at once.
@Dan.F: one word - expose. copy it.
@GRiNSER : Expose has its own set of drawbacks: Like having 30 windows on a macbook pro 1400x1050 screen is really not that helpful. Though its way more helpful than Crap Flip 3D. Expose would be even more useful with keyboard window search...
Regardless of the name, there’s a desire to visually find the window you’re looking for. Something more random-access than the timeline approach of Alt-Tab or Flip-3d, and something that lets you pick the window visually from a set of thumbnails. This is very useful for switching when there are a lot of windows open – but some current approaches don’t scale well and it is likely scaling will become an even more difficult problem as people run even more programs.
There were several comments (and several different suggestions) on making it easier to drag between windows:
@Manicmarc: I would love to see something like Mac OS's Springloaded folders. Drag something over a folder and hover, it pops up, drag over to the next folder, drop it.
@Juan Antonio: It would be useful that when I´m dragging an object I could to open a list or thumbnail of the windows ( maybe a right- click )to select what window use to drop the object.
On this topic, I loved @Kosher’s comment on the difference between being able to do something, and it feeling right.
The UI could be enhanced quite a bit to make it much easier to do things. It's not just about how easy it is but it's also about how smoothly the user transitions between common UI workflows and tasks. This is a bit like explaining the difference between a Ferrari and a Toyota to someone that has never driven a Ferrari though, so I don't know if it will ever happen.
In designing Windows 7, we’ve really been taking the spirit of this comment to heart. I can’t wait to hear what car Windows 7 is compared to once it’s available for a test drive.