As Microsoft is about to release a new version of SQL Server, I would like to spend some time on upgrades today. We are constantly looking at our product offering to decide what kinds of features to build in the future, and so your input is always interesting. I can't comment on future versions of the product, of course, but I can post up some interesting best practices or lessons learned.
I am mostly interested in upgrades with respect to plan quality (ie plan changes on upgrades). The kinds of things I'd like to know are:
* have you had an upgrade experience where plan changes caused a performance issue in your upgraded application? If so, tell me a bit about your application (example: We have a banking application on SQL 2000->2005 that has lots of small transactions that runs on a <basic hardware spec> machine, and our upgrade went well except for this one query where we used this hint to get this special plan in SQL 2000 but it gave us some other plan in SQL 2005 that wasn't as fast)
* what kinds of processes do you use before deploying a new version of SQL Server into your application. (Example: We have a test version of our product running on this other QA machine. We run a few tests on it for things that have caused us problems in the past for each new release/service pack/patch).
* Have you used the USE PLAN feature in SQL 2005 to try to control plan changes when going from one build to another? Experiences with this feature?
So, please email me at: conorc (at) microsoft.com
I'll post up anything interesting that I think would be generally useful to you all.
To be clear, I am really only asking about plan quality issues at this point, not _anything_ about upgrades.
Architect, SQL Server Core Engine Team