Implementing background tasks in .NET Core 2.x webapps or microservices with IHostedService and the BackgroundService class

Background tasks and scheduled jobs are something you might need to implement, eventually, in a microservice based application or in any kind of application. The difference when using a microservices architecture is that you can implement a single microservice process/container for hosting these background tasks so you can scale it down/up as you need or you can even make sure that it runs a single instance of that microservice process/container.
From a generic point of view, in .NET Core we called these type of tasks as Hosted Services, because they are services/logic that you host within your host/application/microservice. Note that in this case, the hosted service simply means a class with the background task logic.
Since .NET Core 2.0, the framework provides a new interface named IHostedService helping you to easily implement hosted services. The basic idea is that you can register multiple background tasks (hosted services), that run in the background while your web host or host is running, as shown in the following image.

Note the difference made between WebHost and Host.

A WebHost (base class implementing IWebHost) in ASP.NET Core 2.0 is the infrastructure artifact you use to provide Http server features to your process, such as if you are implementing an MVC web app or Web API service. It provides all the new infrastructure goodness in ASP.NET Core, enabling you to use dependency injection, insert middlewares in the Http pipeline, etc. and precisely use these IHostedServices for background tasks.

A Host (base class implementing IHost), however, is something new in .NET Core 2.1 (as of the writing of this text, not yet released). Basically, a Host allows you to have a similar infrastructure than what you have with WebHost (dependency injection, hosted services, etc.), but in this case, you just want to have a simple and lighter process as the host, with nothing related to MVC, Web API or Http server features.

Therefore, you can choose and either create a specialized host-process to handle the hosted services and nothing else, such a microservice made just for hosting the IHostedServices, or you can alternatevely extend an existing ASP.NET Core WebHost, such as an existing ASP.NET Core Web API or MVC app. Each approach has pros and cons depending on your business and scalability needs.

Registering hosted services in your WebHost or Host

Let’s drill down further on the IHostedService interface since its usage is pretty similar in a WebHost or in a Host.

SignalR is one example of an artifact using hosted services, but you can also use it for much simpler things like:

  • A background task polling a database looking for changes
  • A scheduled task updating some cache periodically.
  • An implementation of QueueBackgroundWorkItem that allows a task to be executed on a background thread.
  • Processing messages from a message queue in the background of a web app while sharing common services such as ILogger.

You can basically offload any of those actions to a background task based on IHostedService.

The way you add one or multiple IHostedServices into your WebHost or Host is by registering them up through the standard DI (dependency injection) in an ASP.NET Core WebHost (or in a Host in .NET Core 2.1). Basically, you have to register the hosted services within the familiar ConfigureServices() method of the Startup class, as in the following code from a typical ASP.NET WebHost.

public IServiceProvider ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    //Other DI registrations;
    // Register Hosted Services
    services.AddSingleton<IHostedService, GracePeriodManagerService>();
    services.AddSingleton<IHostedService, MyHostedServiceB>();
    services.AddSingleton<IHostedService, MyHostedServiceC>();

In that code, the GracePeriodManagerService hosted service is real code from the Ordering business microservice in eShopOnContainers, while the other two are just two additional samples.

The IHostedService background task execution is coordinated with the lifetime of the application (host or microservice, for that matter). You register tasks when the application starts and you have the opportunity to do some graceful action or clean-up when the application is shutting down.

Without using IHostedService, you could always start a background thread to run any task. The difference is precisely at the app’s shutdown time when that thread would simply be killed without having the opportunity to run graceful clean-up actions.

The IHostedService interface

When you register an IHostedService, .NET Core will call the StartAsync() and StopAsync() methods of your IHostedService type during application start and stop respectively. Specifically, start is called after the server has started and IApplicationLifetime.ApplicationStarted is triggered.

The IHostedService as defined in .NET Core, looks like the following.

namespace Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting
    // Summary:
    //     Defines methods for objects that are managed by the host.
    public interface IHostedService
        // Summary:
        // Triggered when the application host is ready to start the service.
        Task StartAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken);

        // Summary:
        // Triggered when the application host is performing a graceful shutdown.
        Task StopAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken);

As you can imagine, you can create multiple implementations of IHostedService and register them at the ConfigureService() method into the DI container, as shown previously. All those hosted services will be started and stopped along with the application/microservice.

As a developer, you are responsible for handling the stopping action or your services when StopAsync() method is triggered by the host.

Implementing IHostedService with a custom hosted service class deriving from the BackgroundService base class

You could go ahead and create you custom hosted service class from scratch and implement the IHostedService, as you need to do when using .NET Core 2.0.

However, since most background tasks will need pretty similar needs in regard to the cancellation tokens management and other tipical operations, .NET Core 2.1 is providing a very convenient abstract base class you can derive from, named BackgroundService.

That class provides the main work needed to set up the background task. Note that this class will come in the .NET Core 2.1 library so you don’t need to write it.

However, as of the time of this writing, .NET Core 2.1 has not been released. Therefore, in eShopOnContainers which is currently using .NET Core 2.0, we are just “stealing” that class from the open-source repo because it is compatible with the current IHostedService interface in .NET Core 2.0. Kudos to David Fowler who wrote this convenient class. 🙂

When .NET Core 2.1 is released, you'll just need to point to the right NuGet package.

The next code is the abstract BackgroundService base class as implemented in .NET Core 2.1.

// Copyright (c) .NET Foundation. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
/// <summary>
/// Base class for implementing a long running <see cref="IHostedService"/>.
/// </summary>
public abstract class BackgroundService : IHostedService, IDisposable
    private Task _executingTask;
    private readonly CancellationTokenSource _stoppingCts =
                                                   new CancellationTokenSource();

    protected abstract Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken stoppingToken);

    public virtual Task StartAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        // Store the task we're executing
        _executingTask = ExecuteAsync(_stoppingCts.Token);

        // If the task is completed then return it,
        // this will bubble cancellation and failure to the caller
        if (_executingTask.IsCompleted)
            return _executingTask;

        // Otherwise it's running
        return Task.CompletedTask;

    public virtual async Task StopAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        // Stop called without start
        if (_executingTask == null)

            // Signal cancellation to the executing method
            // Wait until the task completes or the stop token triggers
            await Task.WhenAny(_executingTask, Task.Delay(Timeout.Infinite,

    public virtual void Dispose()

When deriving from the previous abstract base class, thanks to that inherited implementation, you just need to implement the ExecuteAsync() method in your own custom hosted service class, as in the following simplified code from eShopOnContainers which is polling a database and publishing integration events into the Event Bus when needed.

public class GracePeriodManagerService
       : BackgroundService
    private readonly ILogger<GracePeriodManagerService> _logger;
    private readonly OrderingBackgroundSettings _settings;

    private readonly IEventBus _eventBus;

    public GracePeriodManagerService(IOptions<OrderingBackgroundSettings> settings,
                                     IEventBus eventBus,
                                     ILogger<GracePeriodManagerService> logger)
            //Constructor’s parameters validations...      

        protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken stoppingToken)
            _logger.LogDebug($"GracePeriodManagerService is starting.");

            stoppingToken.Register(() =>
                    _logger.LogDebug($" GracePeriod background task is stopping."));

            while (!stoppingToken.IsCancellationRequested)
                _logger.LogDebug($"GracePeriod task doing background work.");

                // This eShopOnContainers method is quering a database table 
                // and publishing events into the Event Bus (RabbitMS / ServiceBus)

                await Task.Delay(_settings.CheckUpdateTime, stoppingToken);
            _logger.LogDebug($"GracePeriod background task is stopping.");

        protected override async Task StopAsync (CancellationToken stoppingToken)
               // Run your graceful clean-up actions

In this specific case for eShopOnContainers, it is executing an application method which is quering a database table looking for orders with a specific state and when applying changes, it is publishing integration events through the event bus (underneath it can be using RabbitMQ or Azure Service Bus).

Of course, you could run any other business background task, instead.

By default, the cancellation token is set with a 5 second timeout, although you can change that value when building your WebHost using the UseShutdownTimeout extension of the IWebHostBuilder. This means that our service is expected to cancel within 5 seconds otherwise it will be more abruptly killed.

The following code would be changing that time to 10 seconds.





Summary class diagram

The following image X-X shows a visual summary of the classes and interfaced involved when implementing IHostedServices.

Deployment considerations and takeaways

It is important to note that the way you deploy your ASP.NET Core WebHost or .NET Core Host might impact the final solution. For instance, if you deploy your WebHost on IIS or a regular Azure App Service, your host can be shut down because of app pool recycles. But if you are deploying your host as a container into an orchestrator like Kubernetes or Service Fabric, you can control the assured number of live instances of your host. In addition, you could consider other approaches in the cloud especially made for these scenarios, like Azure Functions.

But even for a WebHost deployed into an app pool, there are scenarios like repopulating or flushing application’s in-memory cache, that would be still applicable.

The IHostedService interface provides a convenient way to start background tasks in an ASP.NET Core web application (in .NET Core 2.0) or in any process/host (starting in .NET Core 2.1 with IHost).

Its main benefit is the opportunity you get with the graceful cancellation to clean-up code of your background tasks when the host itself is shutting down.


UPDATED - January 2nd 2018:

The following page is the official related info, similar to this blog post but reviewed and with additional/minor updates: 


Check it out and send us feedback! 🙂


UPDATED - Feb. 2018

Additional References:

- Run background processes with the IHostedService and how to inject your services with dependency injection

Comments (19)

  1. Hi Guys, I am having some problem with IHostedService and DbContext
    Cannot consume scoped DbContext on a Singleton IHostedService something.
    Anybody have a clue?

    1. Can you provide further info on the errors/issues?

    2. pgroene says:

      You should not inject a Scoped object into a singlton object. The di will check of this when running in Development mode. You need to create your own scope to do this. In this article I explain how to do this:

  2. mohamed abdo says:

    I would like to implement self-hosted service using IHost instead of using WebHost (MVC), this service shall be hosted in docker over Linux environment hosted in azure, the service should manipulate long-running tasks, is there any issue for this model using IHost? could you refer to relative sample?

    1. As mentioned, IHost is still not available until .NET Core 2.1 is released during 2018.
      For now, you need to use an IWebHost within an MVC or Web API process even when you might not be using any Http request or Http feature but just long-running tasks.

  3. Fredrik Rinsén says:

    This looks awesome 🙂

    Are there any articles/guides for running this as an Azure Function out right now? Or will that be when 2.1 is released?

    I don´t really like the way I have tried to build Azure Functions today but this may well change that as it seems to create a closer relationship between Azure Functions and Web Apps.

  4. Lavie Vu says:

    Great post, but I didn’t see the part that shows how we schedule it to run every 5 minutes or trigger it manually when need.

    1. For scheduled tasks, take a look to this other blog post. It is complementary:
      Building a scheduled task in ASP.NET Core/Standard 2.0

  5. Ferron says:

    Great post. I’ve a question about the “Deployment considerations and takeaways”. My .Net Core (MVC) application is going to run on a standalone (domain joined) 2012R2 server. Are there any risk I should consider using these background tasks?

    1. The most important thing to take into account is that when deploying an ASP.NET Core MVC app on an IIS server, it’ll be using an application pool and eventually, the app-pool is shutdown by IIS (IIS app pool recycle) so your background task might not run at that time.
      That fact is not a problem for things like “updating a read-only cache”, but might be a problem if you want to make sure that the background task is being executed ALL the time.
      If your case is the second case, you want to make sure it is running ALL the time, you should deploy with different approaches:
      – Use a Windows Service
      – Use a Docker Container (Windows Container), but for that, you’d need Windows Server 2016 or later.
      – Use Azure Functions

      Also, take into account that if the IHostedServices are running as part of an existing ASP.NET Core MVC app (your case instead of an app just for the IHostedServices) and if you deploy multiple instances of the ASP.NET Core MVC app (I mean, multiple IIS servers with a HTTP Load Balancer, etc.) you will also have multiple instances of the same IHostedServices, one instance per server. So, you’d need to test that scenario in case multiple instances from multiple servers are doing the same background task at the same time.
      If you’ll have a single server, it is a lot easier to test, of course.

      But the main consideration is the one about IIS App Pools being shutdown.

      1. Ferron says:

        Thanks for the insight! I see that you can schedule the app recyling proces. My app is not use 24 hours a day, so that will do.

      2. Kevin says:

        Regarding always-running tasks, you mentioned using a Windows service, Docker in Windows Server 2016, or Azure functions. What would you suggest when in a Dockerized Linux environment? E.g., ASP.Net Core Web App running in Docker on Linux host, and this web app needs to control a background task that might outlive the web app?

        1. Note that if not using IIS (it’ll be using an application pool and eventually, the app-pool is shutdown by IIS) but Kestrel, you don’t have that app-pool issue.
          Since you are talking about Linux, you won’t be using IIS, therefore, you can simply use IHostedServices in any process:

          A. When .NET Core 2.1 is released, I’d use an IHost, which basically is a plain process, like a background task microservice with no MVC or Http dependencies.
          B. Until then, for Linux, you could create a segregated IWebHost process (in an ASP.NET Core process, like a Web API) especially made for those background tasks. Even when this process might also support Http requests, you can use it only for background tasks.

  6. Jonathan Allen says:

    Do you have plans for an adapter that will allow us to run an IHostedService inside a traditional Windows Service?

    1. We created/tested some prototypes, but note that Windows Service support using IHostedServices was only added to .NET Core 2.1, which is still to be released as RTM during 2018.

  7. The main issue with tasks in is when the host shuts down eg app pool recycles. Therefore for critical tasks you would use a more persistent medium like windows service or an Azure web job or whatever they are called these days.

    In what way does this class address those issues? Or does it not, and it is still up to you to figure out what to do if a task gets cancelled half way through? Seems like there is still a lot of cons to doing background tasks this way in a host that isn’t very persistent.

    It would be good to spell out the kind of use cases this is for, and more importantly what it is not good for

    1. @Stephen. That’s very good feedback, but IMHO, that depends on how you are deploying your WebHost or Host.
      In a microservices/containers world, which is where I would use this approach, I can deploy a microservice/container in an orchestrator like KUBERNETES or Azure Service Fabric and make sure I will always have an instance running of my background tasks host.

      This is an agnostic way of implementing background tasks. It is up to you to deploy it in the right way. Agree, IIS App pool recycles is something to be aware of. But if you are using self-hosted services, like using Kestrel and deploying as a container into an orchestrator like KUBERNETES or SERVICE FABRIC, I don’t think you’d have that issue. This is the scenario I was thinking.

      Azure Functions and Azure WebJobs are a great way of doing it, but it is specific to certain infrastructure Azure that you might or might not have available for your project.
      If you have Azure available, Azure Functions are a great way to do it, too.

      You are right that I should mention these considerations.
      Thanks for the feedback, so anyone can read these considerations now. 🙂

Skip to main content