Quiz: More Exception Mysteries

Yesterday I heard about a cool Whidbey feature that inspired me to come up with this little quiz.  The code below when run will print out:

In try

In catch

After try..catch


class Program


    static void Main(string[] args)




            Console.WriteLine(“In try”);

            throw new Exception();


        catch (Exception)


            Console.WriteLine(“In catch”);


        Console.WriteLine(“After try..catch”);




By only adding a few lines of code above the try-statement in the Main() method have it printed out:

In try

Mystery inserted code

In catch

After try..catch


There are no funky streaming, buffer magic required.  Also, you can’t add any code below the try-statement nor can you add any other types, methods, etc to the program.  I will give you one hint, you will need the Whidbey pre-release for this one..    


Comments (12)

  1. Steve Maine says:

    All you have to do is hook the new CatchingException event off the current AppDomain. You can do this without introducing an additional method via anonymous delegates:

    AppDomain.CurrentDomain.CatchingException += delegate( object o, CatchingExceptionEventArgs a )

    { Console.WriteLine( "Mystery inserted code" ); };

  2. You don’t even need to specify the delegates signature – the compiler can infer it, so the following code will work too:

    AppDomain.CurrentDomain.CatchingException += delegate { Console.WriteLine("Mystery inserted code"); };

  3. Robert Kozak says:

    Add Console.WriteLine("Mystery inserted code");

    right after Console.WriteLn("In try");

    Only 1 extra line of code. Yeah I know. Im a dork. πŸ˜€

    — Robert

  4. Andrei says:

    And what is so cool about this feature? The ability to specify cross-cuts as defined in AOP is not implemented in whidbey. I don’t see much sense in the registering the fact that exception was thrown. Anyway, instead of SEH’s resumable exceptions, CLR doesn’t allow to recover from exceptional situation and continue execution from the faulty instruction (without extensive program logic to handle that situation).

  5. Ben Murphy says:

    here is my dodgy version, it compiles in mono not sure about csc

    using System;

    class Program {

    class Exception : System.Exception {

    public Exception() {

    Console.WriteLine("Mystery inserted code");



    static void Main(string[] args) {

    try {

    Console.WriteLine("In try");

    throw new Exception();

    } catch (Exception) {

    Console.WriteLine("In catch");


    Console.WriteLine("After try..catch");



  6. Damn, I was going to do the same as Ben πŸ™‚

  7. mihailik says:

    Of course Steve and Nick are right. But Ben’s answer is very cool too! πŸ™‚

  8. What Ben wrote was the first thing that came to my mind and was an obvious way to get the desired output, but I think Nick and Steve, who both gave answers I didn’t think of, probably have the solution Brad is looking for.

  9. Keith Patrick says:

    Andrei: I can think of several uses for such a feature. For example, it makes a debugger’s implementation of BreakOnException much easier to implement (I’m toying with writing one for some .Net-based scripting support I added to an app of mine). Also, it can greatly help in those issues like XML deserialization or called to ConfigurationSettings.GetConfig, where exceptions can get thrown very deep in the code and are either masked by returning null (ugh) or wrapped in several layers of exceptions, like ConfigurationSettings is so fond of doing

    Of course, the downside to this is that you can get burned when folks use exceptions for non-exceptional cases. IBM’s Java Sax parser made it damn-near impossible for me to effectively use BreakOnException in VAJ, because it threw exceptions EVERYWHERE.

  10. RJ says:

    It also might be useful if you just want to do something silly like Debug.WriteLine the full text of every exception thrown; without modifying all your catch blocks to save the full gory details. Or maybe you don’t even own the actual catch block, and don’t want to rethrow exceptions everywhere. But then, I have not RTFM.

  11. cheater says:

    System.out.println("In trynMystery inserted codenIn catchnAfter try..catchn");


Skip to main content