Clipping in popular music

Aside from the distortion artifacts, one of the biggest problems that results from clipping is a loss of dynamic range.  Remember that the dynamic range of a signal is effectively the difference between the maximum output level and the noise floor.  When you clip a waveform, you lower the maximum sample value, which lowers the output level and reduces dynamic range.

This can happen especially when you amplify a signal.  Amplification increases all parts of a signal, including its noise floor and its maximum value.  Normally, these two values increase by the same amount, so the ratio between them stays the same and dynamic range is unaffected.  Unfortunately, a signal that is amplified too much has to clip at the top end, and that's when DR suffers.

So the moral here is don't overamplify your music, right?  That seems easy enough.  The problem is that popular recording studios don't listen.  Recall that, superficially, louder music sounds better.  Better sounding music sells more discs, and so it pays for the studios to master their music as close to the clipping level as possible.  "But wait," the studio says, "most people are tone-deaf anyway.  We can get it just a little louder than our competition if we clip a little bit off of the peaks."  The competition responds in kind, clipping just a little more, and the result (as Larry scooped me on) is why popular music has terrible dynamic range.

The following articles tell the sad story far better than I can.  I encourage you to give them a read. (mirror)

And one of my favorite illustrations:

And now you know why serious audio aficionados stick to the classics.  🙂

Comments (6)
  1. ColinA says:

    Third link ( appears dead.  I’m getting timeouts.

    I like the visual, though. 🙂

  2. Even recordings that don’t suffer from clipping are affected negatively by the desire to produce louder records.

    In the mastering process audio engineers generally use dynamic compression to process the music. Louder parts of the music are autmatically reduced in volume so that the whole can be amplified more without sounding nasty. Superficially this makes the music sound "better" because louder is better. But tests have shown that music processed this way is more fatiguing to listen to for long and will sound less dynamic.

    Radio and television stations generally use the same techniques to mask differences in volume of the music they play. So even "good" recordings will sound less dynamic on the radio.

  3. Hob Gadling says:

    Any chance then of implementing ReplayGain support in Windows Media Player etc.?

  4. Larry pointed me to a really cool video that graphically and audibly demonstrates the effect of the Loudness

  5. Brandon P says:

    Isn’t it ironic that as we moved to a format with much greater dynamic range (from vinyl to CD), we compressed the dynamic range even further.

    It’s also sad.

    BUT! There is hope! You can still enjoy that great classic rock/pop/jazz/etc DYNAMIC sound.

    Just pick up a new turntable and some old vinyl.

    I have a dream that one day, all DSP programmers and studio mixers, will all listen to the results of their work on nice, mid-to-high end stereos, and try to preserve that great analog sound as it was first played.


  6. Metallica’s new CD, Death Magnetic, is pretty good.  Certainly it is better than St. Anger although

Comments are closed.

Skip to main content