A week ago was the Throne of JS conference in Toronto, perhaps the most interesting and different conference I’ve been to for a while. Quoting its website:
It’s no longer good enough to build web apps around full page loads and then “progressively enhance” them to behave more dynamically. Building apps which are fast, responsive and modern require you to completely rethink your approach.
Disclaimer: I was there to represent Knockout, so obviously I’m not neutral. In this post my focus is on what the creators said about the scope and philosophy of their technologies, and not so much on whether I agree or disagree.
* Yes, I know that’s eight frameworks, not seven. This part was never fully explained…
TL;DR Executive Summary
- For many web developers, it’s now taken for granted that such client-side frameworks are the way to build rich web apps. If you’re not using one, you’re either not building an application, or you’re just missing out.
- There’s lots of consensus among the main frameworks about how to do it (Model-View-* architecture, declarative bindings, etc. — details below), so to some extent you get similar benefits whichever you choose.
- Some major philosophical differences remain, especially the big split between frameworks and libraries. Your choice will deeply influence your architecture.
- The conference itself was stylish and upbeat, with a lot of socialising and conversations across different technology groups. I’d like to see more like this.