Technology For Education

I've noticed a lot of talk about using technology to teach. Not just teaching the technology as a goal of its own but actually using technology to teach better. I think the first thing I noticed recently was Pat Phillip's call for stories about using technology to teach computer science at the CSTA Blog. Pat's looking for CS teachers to share ways in which they use technology to make what they do better, easier or more successful.

The Economist magazine weighed in with a debate on their web pages. They decided that technology does help education. Or as they put it:

This house REJECTS the proposition that "The continuing introduction of new technologies and new media adds little to the quality of most education".

I dare say that the debate is not over everywhere though. I posted some links to videos that use Tablet PCs in education the other day. They ideas sound very good. Are they making a big difference though? That's an open question.

The issue of technology and education is not just in the classroom though. At Educause last week the issue came up in regards to managing the business of education. The question asked was:

“Do you see IT as a means of reducing costs, or is it itself just an additional cost that drives up tuition?”

One interesting reply was:

“I think technology has created the greatest productivity improvement in history over the past 20 years across every segment of our society — except in education.”

I worry that the education field is often too slow, perhaps even too fearful, to really use technology. We're afraid of change. All too often we hesitate to spend time and money getting and really learning to use technology because both resources are in such short supply. We wait for someone else to try things, test things and then document the success.  The External Research & Programs group at Microsoft Research has been funding some experimental projects (Take a look at their site under Supported Projects for some examples) and that is a help I'm sure.

Part of the problem though is that when the efforts that do work are reported back the people who need to hear about them most are not their to hear them. The people who show up to conferences are largely the ones most willing to take chances and try things. They just need a little encouragement to get going. The curriculum directors, school board members, administrators and most classroom teachers just are not hearing about the success.

I'm not sure what the answer is to getting more people to try things and more people to hear about what is actually working but I do believe it is an important thing to work on.

Comments (2)

  1. chris carmody says:

    Being involved in teaching computing subjects for over 20 years I believe the main reason the real change doesn’t occur across the whole is that resourcing doesn’t really go much beyond provideding boxes and internet access. We have 1800 students in a secondary school with one fulltime technician for support, and no curriculum support. It is not up to teachers to make changes that are not resourced for the change to occur. In other professions if change is to occur, it is resourced to change, otherwise it doesn’t happen and why should it. Why should teachers fell guilty about the shortfalls in a systems that is the responsibility of their employer.

  2. I completely agree Chris. Administrations need to commit to training of teachers and curriculum development for technology to succeed in the classroom. While some companies (Microsoft for one but many others) do some curriculum development for their products there needs to be a lot more done by schools/districts to meet the needs of their community and student population. In the end it is the responsibility of administration to make sure that teachers have more than just the hardware and an Internet connection. For too many of them are just assuming that the hardware is "magic" and that is just not so.

Skip to main content