What’s yours… is mine…

   Here is something that I played with today that I think it’s very interesting so I’ thought I’d share.

   I have created a class called ClassLibrary1 (I know.. how original!)… looks like this:

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

using System.Text;


namespace ClassLibrary1


    public class Class1


        private string myString = “Old Value!”;


        public string Test()


            return myString;




   Now, I want to change the private string myString but still use the Test function. Can this be done? Alas! Yes.. it can.. with reflection..

  To load the ClassLibrary1 assembly in my ASP NET application, all I have to do is drop a copy of it in the bin directory of my application. In case you don’t know, that’s all you have to do.. you don’t have to call Assembly.Load, ASP NET will automagically load all assemblies it finds in the bin directory for us. I’ll prove it in a sec..

   Now if I call the Test function from my application, it will return the string “Old Value!”. But I don’t want that.. I want the string to be “New Value!” from now on. Here’s how I can use reflection to change the private field in ClassLibrary1.dll:

Class1 myClass = new Class1();

Type myType = myClass.GetType();


FieldInfo myFieldInfo = myType.GetField(“myString”,BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);


myFieldInfo.SetValue(myClass, “New Value!”);

   Here’s the breakdown of the above code:  

  •    I must first instantiate an instance of my class.

  •    I then need the type of my class so I can get to the GetField method.

  •    I then use the FieldInfo Class to change the private string.

  •    I can then call the SetValue function of the FieldInfo class which needs to know which instance of my class to change.


   Now when I call my Test function, it will return the new value I wrote:


   This returns : “New Value!”.

   Pretty powerful stuff, if you think about all the potential uses…



Comments (2)

  1. drysart@gmail.com says:

    I wouldn’t encourage digging into non-public members in production code as anything other than a last ditch solution, especially if you don’t own the class you’re reflecting into (and if you do own the class, you’re better off by actually exposing what you want properly).  It ties your code to specific dependent library versions, down to even the hotfix level since the innards of a class can change between any revs without notice.

    However, it is a pretty powerful tool to have in your toolbox, since it’s often the only way to get something done. I used the technique to work around a bug in the ToolStrip class in System.Windows.Forms 2.0, for instance.

    Just make sure that your support story for any code deployed that uses this technique allows you the opportunity to revisit it and update it when your assumptions about what goes on inside the black box of another class becomes invalid.

  2. Bambam9876 says:

    I totally agree tfries… great point!

    And you touched on a really important topic in your comment…

    If you do use reflection to change a non-public member of a third party class… don’t expect to be in "supported" territory for that component any more…

    At Microsoft.. we obviously won’t support any code that involves changing Microsoft classes…

    Thanks for the great comment tfries!